Liberal bullshit

-
Friend: Hilary Clinton's problem is that she can't do anything too extreme - being a woman is radical enough, people in America wouldn't accept her if she was as extreme as Sanders. The American people are too small 'c' conservative

 I disagree with all of this, as it assumes Clinton's support base is rooted in some kind of populist, 'small c conservative' sentiment' which wouldn't accept socialist, Sanders-esque policies. This kind of politics is modern-day liberal bollocks, which assumes (as said friend continues to insist is the case with Corbyn) that socialism can only find the slightest threads of support in the educated middle classes. It assumes that the majority of lower-income Americans have as much of an issue with women in positions of power as they do with left-wing policies, and that politics works in discreet single-issue trade-offs, rather than by a dynamic of interplay between voter beliefs, policy and social context.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Miliband the sycophant, yet again

-
Image
Yawn. That's all it induces, as your eyes doggedly scan the text, procuring the scarce semantics conveyed by the tiresome punchlines and lifeless descriptions. The text, exactly? Ed Miliband's latest interview in the New Statesman, of course. If, in some hypothetical, fitting theatrical realm, the Conservative Party was to secure the role of King Claudius, appointing from its considerable array of ministerial actors, the cursed Polonius would no doubt be assumed by Ed Miliband. The Labour leader as ever, offers little in the way of ingenuity, contradicts himself occasionally and intellectually, turns in speechless. Yet it seems as if Miliband cannot even summon the political fight to defend his own party. Labour's legacy in power remains under perpetual Conservative attack; verbal artillery decrying that ghastly, murderous, torturous, massacring, horrible, contemptible, foul  budget deficit remains live, the offensive driven forward by battle cries of irresponsibility and
Read more

How Do You Sleep - Stone Roses (1994)

-
Image
This is a true gem of a tune. It’s probably the most poppy song on Second Coming , and I much prefer it to it’s sister song on the album, Ten Storey Love Song. Ten Storey is a good song in its own right, but lacks the lyrical anger and bitterness of the first album’s snake-fanged bite. Ten Storey is also the showcase of the new Ian Brown vocal: a voice which no longer slips and bleeds through the instrumental fabric but, ala Gallagher, tries to roar over and even fight against it. John Squire’s meatier, bold guitar lines demanded a louder, more potent vocal than the soft whispers of Fools Gold, and the smothered wail heard on This Is The One. Instrumentally, The Second Coming songs lacked the loose, almost improvised roll of the first album. There are fewer empty spaces, fewer moments of pure bass and drum and therefore, fewer moments for Brown to intone gently without competing against the lead guitar.  The lyrics on Second Coming were written entirely
Read more

History repeats itself; first as tragedy, second as farce

-
They just never learn. " The swiftly changing paradigms of the political world pose a vital question for the future of the Labour Party ; evolve to incorporate new, radical ideas and provide a visionary, specific future for the British electorate with which the public may engage and participate within, or simply wither away to political insignificance, fighting the Conservatives over tiny fractions of ideological battleground. Whether or not Labour as a political party has the capacity and internal will to evolve in such a way however, is an entirely different question altogether. "
Read more